Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or Lady do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (together with Those people in apparent violation of proven case legislation) to the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, plus the case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
The official court record is maintained by the court of record. Copies of case file documents are usually not offered over the search site and will need to become ordered from the court of record.
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
The regulation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same sort of case.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police should be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and labor law cases prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account on the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases heard in the state court, with the same level.
eight. For your reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is As a result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.